In a highly controversial statement, President Donald Trump declared on Tuesday that the United States should seize control of Gaza and permanently relocate its Palestinian population to other Middle Eastern nations.
Speaking during a joint press conference at the White House alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump suggested that the two million residents of Gaza be relocated to Egypt and Jordan, citing the destruction caused by Israel’s ongoing military operations following the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.
“The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a great job with it,” Trump said. “We will be responsible for clearing the devastation and rebuilding Gaza into a global hub for tourism and economic growth.”
Tapping into his real estate background, Trump envisioned turning Gaza into “the Riviera of the Middle East,” emphasizing economic revival and job creation as key priorities.
While Trump framed his plan as a humanitarian effort and economic opportunity, his remarks reignite geopolitical tensions that have shaped the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades. Control over Gaza has been a major flashpoint, and any effort to forcibly relocate its Palestinian population evokes historical instances when Western powers redrew borders and displaced communities without regard for local sovereignty.
During his first term as president (2017–2021), Trump implemented policies that heavily favored Israel, leading to heightened tensions in Gaza. In December 2017, Trump officially recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The decision triggered widespread protests in Gaza and the West Bank, as Palestinians view East Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.
In 2018, Trump cut all U.S. funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which provides healthcare, education, and food aid to millions of Palestinian refugees, including those in Gaza. The U.S. was previously UNRWA’s largest donor, contributing close to $500 million annually. The funding cut significantly worsened the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Trump consistently backed Israel’s military responses to Hamas and other Gaza-based militant groups. His administration defended Israel’s right to conduct airstrikes in response to rocket attacks from Gaza, deepening Palestinian resentment toward U.S. foreign policy.
As part of his Middle East peace plan, Trump proposed economic investments to improve living conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. However, Palestinian leaders rejected the initiative, arguing that economic incentives could not replace the need for political sovereignty and territorial rights.
The Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, covering just 365 square kilometers (141 square miles) but home to approximately 2.3 million people. Gaza was part of British-controlled Palestine before coming under Egyptian administration (1948–1967). Israel captured Gaza in the 1967 Six-Day War, establishing Jewish settlements that were fully withdrawn in 2005. Since Hamas took control in 2007, Israel and Egypt have enforced a strict blockade, severely restricting the movement of goods and people.
Years of conflict, blockade, and political instability have created a dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. Over 50% of Gaza’s workforce is unemployed, among the highest rates globally, and more than 80% of residents depend on international food aid. Gaza experiences daily power cuts, receiving electricity for only 4–8 hours a day, while 97% of its water supply is undrinkable due to pollution and overuse. Hospitals lack critical medicines, medical equipment, and emergency care capacity. Frequent Israeli airstrikes destroy key infrastructure, displacing thousands, while border restrictions and funding shortages make rebuilding efforts extremely difficult.
Trump’s suggestion that the U.S. take control of Gaza and relocate its Palestinian population is expected to spark strong international condemnation. Palestinian leadership will likely reject any plan that involves forced displacement. Israel’s stance remains uncertain, as Netanyahu’s government is focused on military operations against Hamas. Egypt and Jordan are unlikely to accept a mass influx of Palestinian refugees, while the United Nations and human rights organizations may condemn the plan as a violation of international law.
While Trump presents his proposal as a solution for rebuilding Gaza, the political, logistical, and legal challenges make it nearly impossible to implement.
Trump’s remarks mark a dramatic shift in U.S. policy and reignite debates over the future of Gaza. His radical proposal challenges longstanding diplomatic norms and raises serious geopolitical questions.
With ongoing Israeli military operations, Palestinian resistance, and international scrutiny, the future of Gaza remains deeply uncertain.
Will Trump’s vision reshape Gaza’s fate, or is it a politically unrealistic move? The world watches as the crisis unfolds with lasting implications for the Middle East and beyond.
Read Also: Trump Proposes U.S. Takeover of Gaza, Calls for Palestinian Exodus in First Major Diplomatic Move
Read Also:Trump: No more free aid—U.S. wants Ukraine’s resources in return
