As tensions rise dramatically following the outbreak of war between Israel and Iran, fears over the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran have resurfaced — with particular concern about the UK’s ability to respond if such weapons were ever launched its way.
The escalation has brought renewed urgency to the question: how vulnerable is Britain to a nuclear strike — and how long would we have to react?
Currently, Israeli intelligence suggests that Iran is enriching uranium close to weapons-grade levels — a claim that US intelligence has not confirmed. But even if true, Iran is not believed to have assembled a fully operational nuclear weapon. What it does reportedly have is the nuclear material needed to begin that process.
UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has issued a stark warning about the possibility of a broader international conflict, including a potential World War III. Speaking from Chequers, the Prime Minister said the UK must prepare for “a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme,” urging for diplomatic de-escalation.
Read Also: What we know about Trump bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites
Just 15 Minutes Warning in Case of an Attack
According to Professor Andrew Futter, interviewed by the express newspaper, a nuclear weapons expert from the University of Leicester, if Iran were to launch a nuclear missile toward Britain, it could reach its target in just 15 minutes
“It wouldn’t give us time to do anything,” Professor Futter told MyLondon. “Government officials might be okay — there is a bunker under Whitehall and some secure facilities for VIPs — but ordinary people would have no time to react.”
Iran lies approximately 3,700 miles from the UK — a similar distance to Russia (3,650 miles), another country with nuclear capabilities. For comparison, China is about 7,775 kilometres away. These distances, paired with modern missile technology, mean nuclear weapons could strike with very little warning.
Can the UK Defend Itself Against a Missile Attack?
A report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) paints a grim picture of Britain’s current defensive capabilities. The UK does not currently possess the ability to intercept a concentrated intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) attack.
The IISS describes missile defence for European countries, including the UK, as more of an “ambition” than a reality. The UK’s Strategic Defence Review outlines plans to improve its missile defence systems, but development will take years — and billions in funding.
Professor Futter adds that while NATO and US-led missile defence systems might offer some protection against missile launches from the Middle East, they are largely ineffective against more advanced Russian missiles, which are capable of deploying decoys and evading interception.
“It has virtually zero capability against Russian missiles that can deploy countermeasures,” he said.
Is a Nuclear Attack on the UK Likely?
Despite the rising geopolitical temperature, experts caution against panic. Professor Futter does not believe a nuclear attack on the UK is likely, describing such an event as “an enormous escalation and essentially suicidal.”
“None of us have a crystal ball, but I don’t see a nuclear attack on the UK being likely,” he said. “It would trigger a global catastrophe — and every country knows that.”
However, with Iran’s alignment with powers like Russia, and its growing technological capabilities, the UK’s vulnerabilities are being questioned more seriously than ever. Whether through diplomacy, deterrence, or defence upgrades, Britain must reassess its readiness for the unthinkable.
Stay with New Daily Prime for continued coverage and analysis on global defence, nuclear tensions, and geopolitical developments.
