The United States has pulled back from launching an immediate military strike on Iran, officials confirmed, amid mounting concerns about limited strategic options, insufficient assets in the region and serious risks of wider conflict. The shift comes as both Tehran and Washington send mixed signals over the ongoing human rights crisis and possible retaliation from Iranian forces.
Behind closed doors, U.S. military and national security officials warned that America is not ready to strike Iran effectively because of constrained capabilities and a lack of guarantees for a decisive outcome. Concerns have been raised that a strike could spark a broader war lasting weeks, while provoking a fierce Iranian response against U.S. forces and regional partners.
Read related news from New Daily Prime:
Iran warns Trump of “Unforgettable Lesson” as US considers military strikes
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran amid unrest
Trump warns possible airstrikes on Iran
President Donald Trump, who earlier promised that support for Iranian protesters was “on the way,” appeared to step back from imminent action late Wednesday. He said he has been assured that “the killing in Iran is stopping,” a claim tied to the cancellation of the planned execution of protest participant Erfan Soltani — an announcement Tehran later contested.
“I’ve been told the killing has stopped and that executions won’t take place. We’re going to watch what the process is,” Mr. Trump told reporters, stopping short of ruling out future action. His remarks reflected a cautious approach, as Washington evaluates whether to escalate its response to Iran’s violent suppression of protests.
In a sign of rising unease, the U.S. has begun withdrawing some personnel from key bases in the Middle East as a precautionary measure amid escalating tensions. Regional airbases, including major facilities in Qatar, have seen reductions in non‑essential staff — a move described by officials as posture adjustments rather than full evacuations.
A Western military source noted that signals of an imminent U.S. attack had been circulating but cautioned that unpredictable messaging may be part of broader strategy rather than evidence of confirmed plans.
Iran’s Reaction and Diplomatic Undercurrents
Iranian officials have issued stern warnings that any U.S. strike would prompt strong retaliation. Tehran’s foreign minister reiterated that there is “no plan” to carry out mass executions, countering international reports of a cancelled hanging and arguing that the regime remains in control.
The situation has also placed significant pressure on international diplomacy. The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to meet at the request of the United States, underscoring growing global concern over human rights and regional stability.
Back home, public sentiment appears skeptical of military involvement abroad. Recent polling showed that around 70% of Americans oppose U.S. military action against Iran, with many calling for congressional approval before any major military engagement.
Critics argue that without clear objectives or support from the U.S. public and international partners, military action could entangle America in a protracted conflict with unpredictable consequences.
